Re: Youtube videos
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2025 3:21 am
Massie Stuns Press With Epstein Intelligence Remark
The Young Turks
Dec 20, 2025 #TheYoungTurks #BreakingNews #TYT
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie finally admitted that Jeffrey Epstein has ties to Israeli intelligence. Cenk Uygur and Yasmin Khan discuss on The Young Turks.
Transcript
All right, guys. Uh, welcome to the
revolution. Uh, so I'm going to give you
guys some updates on some ideas and and
and wonderful things that you guys have
done in a minute. But first, I wanted to
give you a story that we promised you
earlier on the Young Turks. It fits into
the revolution because it's a story uh
about how we are uh there are forces
inside America trying to control uh
American government uh on behalf of a
different country in this case Israel.
So let's do this story.
Epstein also had close ties to our own
intelligence agencies and Israel's
intelligence agencies. That's why
there's so much u effort in trying to
stop this and and I do believe they'll
try to stop it somewhere else. Uh, and
that's going to backfire on them, too.
I love that he finally said it. Yes,
it's definitely Israel. We're going to
show you here with a new story from
Dropside News that shows once again that
Epstein was working with the Israelis.
And so, the mainstream media has been
ignoring it. He But he's a US
congressman. So, they're probably going
to have to address it. And if they're
going to address it, they're going to
probably do what Dana Bash did with
Marjorie Taylor Green. Are you saying
that Israel was involved? That sounds
conspiratorial.
Yeah, because it was a literal
conspiracy where Epstein was working
behind the scenes to help Israel. So,
let's give you the facts and you'll see
for yourself. So, um latest article from
job site, Jeffrey Epste pursued Swiss
Rothschild Bank to finance Israeli cyber
weapons empire.
Gee, I wonder if he was working with
Israel.
Okay, look, I it's unfortunate that this
bank happens to be called Rothschild
because there's there is a actual
conspiracy theory that is anti-Semitic
about how the Rothschilds run the whole
world. I think it's a comical theory,
but in this case, it just happens to be
a bank and a person with that same name.
So, the central figures here are Epstein
Ehud Barack, the former prime minister
of Israel, and this is hilarious,
Baroness Arian Rothschild. We have a
baroness who would also of course like
to help Israel and so she's the CEO of
Edmund de Rothschild group. Uh that's an
enormous Swiss private bank. Okay. Epste
spent years trying to connect Barack and
the Rothschild and that's what the story
is about. So they explain in one note,
Epstein passed along tentalizing offer
from the Rothschild to Barack. If Ahood
wants to make serious money, he will
have to build a relationship with me.
take time so that we can truly
understand one another. So now the
Baroness
wants Israel to get cyber weapons. And
now that's the former prime minister of
Israel. So she's like, "Come here and
I'll give you the money and then you
could do this plot for us, but you have
to get to know me first." Okay. Then uh
they explained Barack asked for advice,
deferring to Epstein's supposed
expertise on women. He said, 'I'm ready,
but I need your advice regarding how
ladies is your forte.
Not really. Young children that he's
raping is his forte, but okay. Uh,
according to Drop Site News, the purpose
of connecting Rothschild and Barack was
to secure financing for this. Quote,
Barack's private communications showed
discussions about a wide range of cyber
weapons, concepts drawn from Israeli
military research inspired in part by
the astonishing scope of US global
surveillance apparatus revealed by NSA
whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
Oh, great. The Israelis need more cyber
weapons. And so you've got Epstein
trying to arrange that with the former
prime minister and the and the good
baroness the Rothschild. Okay. Um so
there's now by the way to be clear
there's no evidence to confirm whether
or not the Rothschild bank actually
directly financed the cyber weapon
startup. So we don't know from the
material that we have here. This is the
leaked emails of Aud Barack. Uh these
are part of the Hondela uh leaks and
they have been confirmed in parts by
drop site news and the US government. So
but in October 2015 they explained the
do the Rothschild negotiated a $25
million contract with Epstein's southern
trust company the same entity Epste used
to fund Barack's intelligence link
security startup uh reporting homeland
security known as Carbine earlier that
year.
So now that's interesting because
um here is an effort to fund Israel's
cyber weapons
and Epstein is deeply involved in it and
he's getting money too. So people
wondered where did all of Epstein's
money come from. Now look, they probably
came from a variety of different
sources, but apparently some of it came
to procure help procure cyber weapons
for Israel. Now, since this is such a
huge story and Epstein is one of the
largest stories certainly of this
administration and maybe of any
administration and the mainstream press
is reporting, oh, did Donald Trump do
it? Donald Trump, Donald Trump, Donald
Trump. Okay, Donald Trump is one of the
people who might or might not have done
it. He's the president of the United
States, so I understand why you're
paying a lot of attention to that, but
we found out who he was working with. It
was Israel. Do you want to pay attention
to that at all? No. No. No. No. No. No
way. No way. No way. Don't say it. Don't
say it. Cover it up for Israel. But
we're objective.
If you're objective, why are you trying
to hide the news? That's super weird.
Okay. So, now you've published many
other pieces as well. Drop site News has
about EP's links to the Israeli
government and intelligence agencies,
and we've told you about that. He was
trying to get America to bomb Syria on
behalf of Israel. Then he tried to get
America to bomb Iran on behalf of
Israel. uh he arranged a meeting with
Vladimir Putin and Ahoud Barack that
Ahoud Barack couldn't arrange. So he is
more powerful than the former prime
minister of Israel. He's powerful enough
to get a meeting with Vladimir Putin
anytime he wants. He was working with
some of the top bankers, some of the
countries in the world. And all of it in
all of the emails are to help Israel.
But mainstream media is like what was
the adage? Was it follow the propaganda,
follow the husb?
Wait, it was follow the money, right?
The journalism adage. No, no, don't
follow the money. Don't follow it.
Whatever you do, don't follow it. Okay,
guys, we got it. We got it. You love
Israel, but you're supposed to be
American media. The way that they are so
unbelievably biased is maddening. Which
leads us to the next part of the story.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post editorial
board is chiding Congress for voting to
release the Epstein files. Gee, I wonder
why the Washington Post editorial board
cares. Why hide the Epstein files? No,
please don't find out it's Israel.
Please, please shut up everybody. You're
all anti-semites. All of America is
anti-semmites.
You of course the children of America
should be raped for Israel's advantage
because but if you say it, you're
anti-semmites. You No, no, no. Bring
your children otherwise you're an
anti-semite. You have to allow them to
do it. Anti-semite.
No. Absurd. And stop saying that. that
it isn't about all Jews. It's about
these particular guys who are not loyal
to Jews overall. They're loyal to a
country, Israel, a government, Israel.
Okay. So,
uh and the board did slam Donald Trump
here uh for flip-flopping on this issue
of it uh whether they should be
unveiled. They didn't want them to
flip-flop. They wanted them to hide the
Epstein files forever so their beloved
Israel wouldn't be exposed. Anyway,
here's editorial board. quote, "The
whole sorted exercise is a testament to
the collapse of political trust, and no
one comes out looking good." Yes, the
political trust has collapsed because
a-holes like you go, "Don't release
anything secret and nefarious to the
American people. They're not to be
trusted. They're all dirty
anti-semmites." No, you hide all the
evidence of all the wrongdoing by the
powerful and you screw over the American
people. I wonder why they lost political
trust. Huh? I can't figure it out. I
mean, really, is the Washington Post
editorial board that stupid?
Really? Are you that mentally deficient
that you can't figure out that that's
why maybe people lost trust in the
government? Cuz they keep hiding things
like the Epstein files, the the brain
trust that the Washington Post got
together. This is the editorial board.
They're like, "What do you think? Uh,
you think if we hide the Epstein files,
they'll have more trust in the
government?" Oh, of course. Of course.
You think if we hide the fact that Epc
was working with Israel, they'll trust
the government more? Of course, of
course, of course. Hide. Hide. Hide.
Hide. And what are you in the business
of? Journalism.
Are you Are you Is that journalism?
Hiding the dirty secrets of the
powerful. Well, these days they that is
what mainstream media does. That is what
the Washington Post does. So, it's not
that surprising at all that they would
think, yeah, that's our job is to hide
the crimes of the powerful and to help
them crush the powerless. Okay. So, they
continue. The lone congressional
objector, Representative Klay Higgins,
has a point when he says the
indiscriminate release abandons 250
years of criminal justice procedure in
America and could result in innocent
people being hurt. Absurd. They're like,
"Oh no, the poor little innocent
pedophiles. Oh, don't let Oh, no. Oh,
the kids who got raped, who cares about
them? They're useless. They're
irrelevant. We've already gotten all the
use we need out of them. But the
pedophiles, won't anyone protect the
pedophiles?" Now look, I understand what
they're saying. Well, what if they
somebody was talking to Epstein or is in
his book and his name gets released, but
we don't know whether they did it or
not. Well, first of all, we're going to
get the information. And so, we're not
that dumb that we see a name. For
example, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton
are already two names we know. Are we
assuming for sure that they did it?
Maybe partisans are, right? Oh, yeah. I
bet Trump did it, but Clinton didn't. I
bet Clinton did it, but Trump didn't.
That's partisan brain, right? But the
rest of us get it. We don't know yet. We
don't know if Trump did it. We don't
know if Clinton did it. Maybe we'll get
information that'll show or not, but
we're not nearly as dumb as you guys are
in the Washington Post editorial board.
So, we're not just going to see a name
and be like, "Oh, that's it. He
definitely did it." Right. And second of
all, if you say that someone definitely
did it, and they didn't, they could sue
you. Alan Dersitz can't wait. He was in
a segment with my co-host Kasparian uh
on LA Arabia and he's like, "Oh, I can't
wait to get the victim's names cuz we're
going to punish them. We're going to sue
them all. Whoever says a wrong name. So,
he's already chomping at the bit. You
know, it does whether it's a wrong name
or you don't have sufficient evidence to
prove it. No, they're can't those
billionaires can't wait to have somebody
like Alan Derswood sue the the victims.
They they're already lined up to do
that. But the Washington Post board
apparently didn't think about that. They
don't know that that's possible. And
who's abandoning criminal justice? Look
guys, think about this core issue,
right? So they say, "No, no, we should
keep hiding the names cuz what if the
pedophiles are harmed?" Or, "But what if
one of them is not a pedophile?" Okay.
Well, wait a minute. If you're in favor
of justice, then why didn't you do an
editorial about the government not
prosecuting the actual pedophiles? So,
that's a great way for us to know who
did it and who didn't do it. The
government finds the people who did it
and they prosecute them. And then the
other ones, they say they didn't do it,
so you and we're not going to prosecute
them. That's how justice would normally
work. But no, the Washington Post says,
"Don't do any of that." And who cares
that they didn't prosecute any of the
guilty because we don't care about the
kids who were raped. We don't care about
them at all. We don't care about the
American people. We don't care that
Epstein is working with Israel. We don't
care about any of that. All we care
about is protecting the super powerful
who are connected to Epstein. Gee, I
wonder why. I wonder why. So, uh, the
board argued that the bill is filled
with loopholes. Wait, you don't want it
released in the first place. So, what do
you care about the loopholes?
Information that is released might not
necessarily be incriminating. Again,
we're not, uh, we're not as dumb as you
are. We can make that, uh, distinction.
And according to both the FBI and the
federal lead prosecutor in charge of
negotiating FC's 2008 plea deal
agreement, Epstein was the only one
abusing children. Yeah, if you're an
idiot, you believe that. And uh but if
you were a journalist, you'd go, "Well,
is that really true? Let me investigate
a little bit more." In fact, that's what
Julie Brown did at the Miami Herald. And
she did a fantastic of job of of
realizing and showing and proving that
no, the 2008 was a sweetheart deal.
Epstein had committed way more rape uh
than that uh you know that case uh
you know was adjudicated as because they
just gave him a plea deal and they let
him go out in in during the daytime
basically used the the jail as a as a
hotel. It was a disgusting deal and that
the corrupt prosecutor who did it was
later rewarded uh and made a labor
secretary randomly under Donald Trump in
his first term. So, but they take that
obviously corrupt deal and the
Washington Post is like, "You see that?
That proves the innocence." No, it
proves that you're part of the
corruption. It proves that you love to
cover up the crimes of the powerful
while pretending to be reporters and
journalists. You're the exact opposite.
And this is what we have to fix about
our country. Our mainstream media is a
joke. They don't do the news. They do
propaganda. And apparently they do
propaganda from time to time on behalf
of foreign countries, on behalf of the
powerful, on behalf of the donors.
So they've been lying to us our whole
life. Oh yeah, no, the politicians are
honest. No, they're not. The politicians
take money from Israel, from big pharma,
from oil, from military industrial
complex, and they serve those donors
loyally. And the job of the Washington
Post is to go and cover that up. Cover
they're they're the getaway driver in
this crime. and their job is to cover up
all of the evidence. No, no, no. Don't
give them the news. Give them
propaganda. Give them propaganda. Oh,
no. Politicians are not affected by the
millions of dollars that they get. None
of the When we talk about legislation,
we are going to pretend they're having
debates. We're not going to tell you
that. In reality, they all got paid by
donors and voted with the donors
approximately
100% of the time. And the legendary
Washington Post, the actual publication
that where the adage came from, follow
the money during Watergate says don't
follow the money. Don't follow evidence.
Hide all the evidence. And that's what
real journalism looks like. No, it's an
absolute piece of trash. And the whole
point of that paper is to cover up the
crimes of the powerful to make sure you
never find out about it. I hope I was
clear enough.
What a ridiculous ed editorial board
filled with obviously corrupt,
disgusting people who are against the
American voters and against American
citizens. Now, I think I'm even more
clear. Every time you ring the bell
below, an angel gets it wings. Totally
not true, but it does keep you updated
on our live shows. Every time you ring
the bell below, an angel gets his wings.
Totally not true, but it does keep you
updated on our live shows.
The Young Turks
Dec 20, 2025 #TheYoungTurks #BreakingNews #TYT
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie finally admitted that Jeffrey Epstein has ties to Israeli intelligence. Cenk Uygur and Yasmin Khan discuss on The Young Turks.
Transcript
All right, guys. Uh, welcome to the
revolution. Uh, so I'm going to give you
guys some updates on some ideas and and
and wonderful things that you guys have
done in a minute. But first, I wanted to
give you a story that we promised you
earlier on the Young Turks. It fits into
the revolution because it's a story uh
about how we are uh there are forces
inside America trying to control uh
American government uh on behalf of a
different country in this case Israel.
So let's do this story.
Epstein also had close ties to our own
intelligence agencies and Israel's
intelligence agencies. That's why
there's so much u effort in trying to
stop this and and I do believe they'll
try to stop it somewhere else. Uh, and
that's going to backfire on them, too.
I love that he finally said it. Yes,
it's definitely Israel. We're going to
show you here with a new story from
Dropside News that shows once again that
Epstein was working with the Israelis.
And so, the mainstream media has been
ignoring it. He But he's a US
congressman. So, they're probably going
to have to address it. And if they're
going to address it, they're going to
probably do what Dana Bash did with
Marjorie Taylor Green. Are you saying
that Israel was involved? That sounds
conspiratorial.
Yeah, because it was a literal
conspiracy where Epstein was working
behind the scenes to help Israel. So,
let's give you the facts and you'll see
for yourself. So, um latest article from
job site, Jeffrey Epste pursued Swiss
Rothschild Bank to finance Israeli cyber
weapons empire.
Gee, I wonder if he was working with
Israel.
Okay, look, I it's unfortunate that this
bank happens to be called Rothschild
because there's there is a actual
conspiracy theory that is anti-Semitic
about how the Rothschilds run the whole
world. I think it's a comical theory,
but in this case, it just happens to be
a bank and a person with that same name.
So, the central figures here are Epstein
Ehud Barack, the former prime minister
of Israel, and this is hilarious,
Baroness Arian Rothschild. We have a
baroness who would also of course like
to help Israel and so she's the CEO of
Edmund de Rothschild group. Uh that's an
enormous Swiss private bank. Okay. Epste
spent years trying to connect Barack and
the Rothschild and that's what the story
is about. So they explain in one note,
Epstein passed along tentalizing offer
from the Rothschild to Barack. If Ahood
wants to make serious money, he will
have to build a relationship with me.
take time so that we can truly
understand one another. So now the
Baroness
wants Israel to get cyber weapons. And
now that's the former prime minister of
Israel. So she's like, "Come here and
I'll give you the money and then you
could do this plot for us, but you have
to get to know me first." Okay. Then uh
they explained Barack asked for advice,
deferring to Epstein's supposed
expertise on women. He said, 'I'm ready,
but I need your advice regarding how
ladies is your forte.
Not really. Young children that he's
raping is his forte, but okay. Uh,
according to Drop Site News, the purpose
of connecting Rothschild and Barack was
to secure financing for this. Quote,
Barack's private communications showed
discussions about a wide range of cyber
weapons, concepts drawn from Israeli
military research inspired in part by
the astonishing scope of US global
surveillance apparatus revealed by NSA
whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
Oh, great. The Israelis need more cyber
weapons. And so you've got Epstein
trying to arrange that with the former
prime minister and the and the good
baroness the Rothschild. Okay. Um so
there's now by the way to be clear
there's no evidence to confirm whether
or not the Rothschild bank actually
directly financed the cyber weapon
startup. So we don't know from the
material that we have here. This is the
leaked emails of Aud Barack. Uh these
are part of the Hondela uh leaks and
they have been confirmed in parts by
drop site news and the US government. So
but in October 2015 they explained the
do the Rothschild negotiated a $25
million contract with Epstein's southern
trust company the same entity Epste used
to fund Barack's intelligence link
security startup uh reporting homeland
security known as Carbine earlier that
year.
So now that's interesting because
um here is an effort to fund Israel's
cyber weapons
and Epstein is deeply involved in it and
he's getting money too. So people
wondered where did all of Epstein's
money come from. Now look, they probably
came from a variety of different
sources, but apparently some of it came
to procure help procure cyber weapons
for Israel. Now, since this is such a
huge story and Epstein is one of the
largest stories certainly of this
administration and maybe of any
administration and the mainstream press
is reporting, oh, did Donald Trump do
it? Donald Trump, Donald Trump, Donald
Trump. Okay, Donald Trump is one of the
people who might or might not have done
it. He's the president of the United
States, so I understand why you're
paying a lot of attention to that, but
we found out who he was working with. It
was Israel. Do you want to pay attention
to that at all? No. No. No. No. No. No
way. No way. No way. Don't say it. Don't
say it. Cover it up for Israel. But
we're objective.
If you're objective, why are you trying
to hide the news? That's super weird.
Okay. So, now you've published many
other pieces as well. Drop site News has
about EP's links to the Israeli
government and intelligence agencies,
and we've told you about that. He was
trying to get America to bomb Syria on
behalf of Israel. Then he tried to get
America to bomb Iran on behalf of
Israel. uh he arranged a meeting with
Vladimir Putin and Ahoud Barack that
Ahoud Barack couldn't arrange. So he is
more powerful than the former prime
minister of Israel. He's powerful enough
to get a meeting with Vladimir Putin
anytime he wants. He was working with
some of the top bankers, some of the
countries in the world. And all of it in
all of the emails are to help Israel.
But mainstream media is like what was
the adage? Was it follow the propaganda,
follow the husb?
Wait, it was follow the money, right?
The journalism adage. No, no, don't
follow the money. Don't follow it.
Whatever you do, don't follow it. Okay,
guys, we got it. We got it. You love
Israel, but you're supposed to be
American media. The way that they are so
unbelievably biased is maddening. Which
leads us to the next part of the story.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post editorial
board is chiding Congress for voting to
release the Epstein files. Gee, I wonder
why the Washington Post editorial board
cares. Why hide the Epstein files? No,
please don't find out it's Israel.
Please, please shut up everybody. You're
all anti-semites. All of America is
anti-semmites.
You of course the children of America
should be raped for Israel's advantage
because but if you say it, you're
anti-semmites. You No, no, no. Bring
your children otherwise you're an
anti-semite. You have to allow them to
do it. Anti-semite.
No. Absurd. And stop saying that. that
it isn't about all Jews. It's about
these particular guys who are not loyal
to Jews overall. They're loyal to a
country, Israel, a government, Israel.
Okay. So,
uh and the board did slam Donald Trump
here uh for flip-flopping on this issue
of it uh whether they should be
unveiled. They didn't want them to
flip-flop. They wanted them to hide the
Epstein files forever so their beloved
Israel wouldn't be exposed. Anyway,
here's editorial board. quote, "The
whole sorted exercise is a testament to
the collapse of political trust, and no
one comes out looking good." Yes, the
political trust has collapsed because
a-holes like you go, "Don't release
anything secret and nefarious to the
American people. They're not to be
trusted. They're all dirty
anti-semmites." No, you hide all the
evidence of all the wrongdoing by the
powerful and you screw over the American
people. I wonder why they lost political
trust. Huh? I can't figure it out. I
mean, really, is the Washington Post
editorial board that stupid?
Really? Are you that mentally deficient
that you can't figure out that that's
why maybe people lost trust in the
government? Cuz they keep hiding things
like the Epstein files, the the brain
trust that the Washington Post got
together. This is the editorial board.
They're like, "What do you think? Uh,
you think if we hide the Epstein files,
they'll have more trust in the
government?" Oh, of course. Of course.
You think if we hide the fact that Epc
was working with Israel, they'll trust
the government more? Of course, of
course, of course. Hide. Hide. Hide.
Hide. And what are you in the business
of? Journalism.
Are you Are you Is that journalism?
Hiding the dirty secrets of the
powerful. Well, these days they that is
what mainstream media does. That is what
the Washington Post does. So, it's not
that surprising at all that they would
think, yeah, that's our job is to hide
the crimes of the powerful and to help
them crush the powerless. Okay. So, they
continue. The lone congressional
objector, Representative Klay Higgins,
has a point when he says the
indiscriminate release abandons 250
years of criminal justice procedure in
America and could result in innocent
people being hurt. Absurd. They're like,
"Oh no, the poor little innocent
pedophiles. Oh, don't let Oh, no. Oh,
the kids who got raped, who cares about
them? They're useless. They're
irrelevant. We've already gotten all the
use we need out of them. But the
pedophiles, won't anyone protect the
pedophiles?" Now look, I understand what
they're saying. Well, what if they
somebody was talking to Epstein or is in
his book and his name gets released, but
we don't know whether they did it or
not. Well, first of all, we're going to
get the information. And so, we're not
that dumb that we see a name. For
example, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton
are already two names we know. Are we
assuming for sure that they did it?
Maybe partisans are, right? Oh, yeah. I
bet Trump did it, but Clinton didn't. I
bet Clinton did it, but Trump didn't.
That's partisan brain, right? But the
rest of us get it. We don't know yet. We
don't know if Trump did it. We don't
know if Clinton did it. Maybe we'll get
information that'll show or not, but
we're not nearly as dumb as you guys are
in the Washington Post editorial board.
So, we're not just going to see a name
and be like, "Oh, that's it. He
definitely did it." Right. And second of
all, if you say that someone definitely
did it, and they didn't, they could sue
you. Alan Dersitz can't wait. He was in
a segment with my co-host Kasparian uh
on LA Arabia and he's like, "Oh, I can't
wait to get the victim's names cuz we're
going to punish them. We're going to sue
them all. Whoever says a wrong name. So,
he's already chomping at the bit. You
know, it does whether it's a wrong name
or you don't have sufficient evidence to
prove it. No, they're can't those
billionaires can't wait to have somebody
like Alan Derswood sue the the victims.
They they're already lined up to do
that. But the Washington Post board
apparently didn't think about that. They
don't know that that's possible. And
who's abandoning criminal justice? Look
guys, think about this core issue,
right? So they say, "No, no, we should
keep hiding the names cuz what if the
pedophiles are harmed?" Or, "But what if
one of them is not a pedophile?" Okay.
Well, wait a minute. If you're in favor
of justice, then why didn't you do an
editorial about the government not
prosecuting the actual pedophiles? So,
that's a great way for us to know who
did it and who didn't do it. The
government finds the people who did it
and they prosecute them. And then the
other ones, they say they didn't do it,
so you and we're not going to prosecute
them. That's how justice would normally
work. But no, the Washington Post says,
"Don't do any of that." And who cares
that they didn't prosecute any of the
guilty because we don't care about the
kids who were raped. We don't care about
them at all. We don't care about the
American people. We don't care that
Epstein is working with Israel. We don't
care about any of that. All we care
about is protecting the super powerful
who are connected to Epstein. Gee, I
wonder why. I wonder why. So, uh, the
board argued that the bill is filled
with loopholes. Wait, you don't want it
released in the first place. So, what do
you care about the loopholes?
Information that is released might not
necessarily be incriminating. Again,
we're not, uh, we're not as dumb as you
are. We can make that, uh, distinction.
And according to both the FBI and the
federal lead prosecutor in charge of
negotiating FC's 2008 plea deal
agreement, Epstein was the only one
abusing children. Yeah, if you're an
idiot, you believe that. And uh but if
you were a journalist, you'd go, "Well,
is that really true? Let me investigate
a little bit more." In fact, that's what
Julie Brown did at the Miami Herald. And
she did a fantastic of job of of
realizing and showing and proving that
no, the 2008 was a sweetheart deal.
Epstein had committed way more rape uh
than that uh you know that case uh
you know was adjudicated as because they
just gave him a plea deal and they let
him go out in in during the daytime
basically used the the jail as a as a
hotel. It was a disgusting deal and that
the corrupt prosecutor who did it was
later rewarded uh and made a labor
secretary randomly under Donald Trump in
his first term. So, but they take that
obviously corrupt deal and the
Washington Post is like, "You see that?
That proves the innocence." No, it
proves that you're part of the
corruption. It proves that you love to
cover up the crimes of the powerful
while pretending to be reporters and
journalists. You're the exact opposite.
And this is what we have to fix about
our country. Our mainstream media is a
joke. They don't do the news. They do
propaganda. And apparently they do
propaganda from time to time on behalf
of foreign countries, on behalf of the
powerful, on behalf of the donors.
So they've been lying to us our whole
life. Oh yeah, no, the politicians are
honest. No, they're not. The politicians
take money from Israel, from big pharma,
from oil, from military industrial
complex, and they serve those donors
loyally. And the job of the Washington
Post is to go and cover that up. Cover
they're they're the getaway driver in
this crime. and their job is to cover up
all of the evidence. No, no, no. Don't
give them the news. Give them
propaganda. Give them propaganda. Oh,
no. Politicians are not affected by the
millions of dollars that they get. None
of the When we talk about legislation,
we are going to pretend they're having
debates. We're not going to tell you
that. In reality, they all got paid by
donors and voted with the donors
approximately
100% of the time. And the legendary
Washington Post, the actual publication
that where the adage came from, follow
the money during Watergate says don't
follow the money. Don't follow evidence.
Hide all the evidence. And that's what
real journalism looks like. No, it's an
absolute piece of trash. And the whole
point of that paper is to cover up the
crimes of the powerful to make sure you
never find out about it. I hope I was
clear enough.
What a ridiculous ed editorial board
filled with obviously corrupt,
disgusting people who are against the
American voters and against American
citizens. Now, I think I'm even more
clear. Every time you ring the bell
below, an angel gets it wings. Totally
not true, but it does keep you updated
on our live shows. Every time you ring
the bell below, an angel gets his wings.
Totally not true, but it does keep you
updated on our live shows.
