|
'I'm an atheist BUT ...' As Daniel Dennett noted in Breaking the Spell, a bafflingly large number of intellectuals 'believe in belief' even though they lack religious belief themselves. These vicarious second-order believers are often more zealous than the real thing, their zeal pumped up by ingratiating broad-mindedness: 'Alas, I can't share your faith but I respect and sympathize with it.'
... Look out for it.... Atheists as well as theists unconsciously
observe society's convention that we must be especially polite and
respectful to faith.
*** Let me not
labour the point. I have probably said enough to
convince at least my older readers that an atheistic world-view provides
no justification for cutting the Bible, and other sacred books, out of
our education. And of course we can retain a sentimental loyalty to the
cultural and literary traditions of, say, Judaism, Anglicanism or Islam,
and even participate in religious rituals such as marriages and
funerals; without buying into the supernatural beliefs that historically
went along with those traditions. We can
give up belief in God while not losing touch with a treasured heritage.
***
[S]ophisticated theologians like
Tillich or
Bonhoeffer
... If only such
subtle, nuanced religion predominated, the world would surely be a better place
... this kind of understated, decent, revisionist religion is numerically negligible....
***
[B]ear in mind that I am calling only supernatural gods delusional.
***
Pantheists don't believe in a
supernatural God at all, but use the word God as a non-supernatural
synonym for Nature, or for the Universe, or for the lawfulness that
governs its workings....Pantheism is
sexed-up atheism.
-- "The God Delusion," by Richard Dawkins |